Global warming fiasco

One of the unanswered questions about AGW is how much government money has gone into "proving" all the phony statistics used to make the case.  In any case however much has been committed by the government to prove AGW is too much.  In this post we see how much corruption exists by those using data to make the case for the unprovable.  It is a disgrace that those trained in science, or in the scientific approach, are willing to distort and manage information to benefit their particular slice of the payola pie.  There is probably a case to be made for the government to pay for developing data that might possibly reveal a threat to the safety of the populace, but there is no case to be made for paying for the data and then machining it to come out a certain way.  This is fraud and is what we have here.  Those who took the government grants and the like wanted the outcome of their studies to make the case that there is such a thing as AGW in order to keep the flow of funds coming.  So where is the peer review and other safeguards against this abuse.  MIA, that's where.
















a