Friday, October 24, 2014

Friday, October 24, 2014

THE LINES ARE DRAWN ONCE AND FOR ALL: It's going to be a very difficult battle but it has to be won by the forces of freedom.

AN IMPORTANT OBSCURE CONSERVATIVE VOICE: Haven't heard too much about this obscure professor but need to.

A DEBATE ON UNEMPLOYMENT NUMBERS:The key lies in the Labor participation numbers.

THIS RANT IS AN EXAMPLE OF HOW FRUSTRATED CONSERVATIVE:It is true we are in real trouble and it will probably take major action/activities to change things.  There are remedies, like term limits, like making it a crime to become a lobbyist after serving in the Congress, like calling out lies in campaigns by a nonpartisan, functioning media.  Franlky, professional politicians of all stripes are at the root of the problem 50 can run for Congress..

Thursday, October 23, 2014

Thursday, October 23, 2014

GLAD JONAH'S ON OUR SIDE:Numbers don't lie until used by the likes of the NYTimes.

A CHRISTIAN VIEW OF THE OBAMA WORLD:If this doesn't resonate then your a Democrat.

AND BILL CLINTON WAS A GREAT PRESIDENT?:Hard to believe this scumag was POTUS and that his equally scumbag wife may become POTUS. It is truly grating that this couple has been the face of America for so many years.  He is an indecent man and she is his accomplice.  As for Bill. besides pandering to minority elements of our society for votes, using any means including lies and distortions, he also is a man of no character, a serial rapist and possibly involved in more than one murder of staff people.  What's more he managed to put in place and support a Secretary of HUD, Andrew Cuomo, who was the official most responsible for the '07/'08 financial meltdown that has led to the fractured economy we have had since Obama took office.  Still this very destructive, divisive politician is the apple of his party's voters and somehow manages to pull down hundreds of thousands for speeches and by the way, is lionized on college campuses.  What kind of country elects and respects leaders of this caliber.

THE NON-SOLUTION TO A BIG PROBLEM:Fornier is a liberal, at heart, and he's suggesting, basically, the rearranging of chairs on the Titanic.Really!  Leon Panetta as CoS for Obama.  Not gonna happen.  Panetta, much admired, loved and respected by Washington insiders like Fournier, is n solution th Obama's inherent inability to lead and comet grips with major issues.  Obama is an ideologue who's not about to change his stripes.  Besides, if Panetta was really a great advisor and/or patriot, why didn't he force Obama's hand over the Benghazi issue by threatening resignation.  Panetta is a political animal and let's not forget was a leader in the HoR while government was growing and funding ever more liberal programs designed to enslave ever more Americans.  Panetta is no solution to big government bloat and inefficiency, he's one of the problems.  If one is looking for a solution to all the problems not being addressed by this administration, it surely is not a reshuffling of chairs and people.  Finally, want to effect change, don't take advice from Washington insiders.  Frankly, there are no liberals inside or outside of Washington capable of helping this administration or our problems with the economy or with foreign affairs.  What's needed is reform of the political class and the government bureaucracies.  Where's that person?

Monday, October 20, 2014

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

CREEPY PEOPLE DO CREEPY THINGS:This administration sets new standards (lower) for abject corruption.

THIS IS INTERESTING STUFF: The chart and "comment" are quite revealing. The Liberal Mindset is truly pathetic.


Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Goldman Sachs Loves Obama

[UPDATE 10/6/2011: Well whaddya Instalanche! One interesting note - Sharyl Attkisson who filed the report for CBS quoted below from October of 2008 is the CBS reporter who recently came under fire from the Obama administration for her reporting on Fast and Furious in which officials at the White House and DOJ screamed and yelled at her (I unintentionally misspelled her name as Cheryl Atkisson at the time because I was transcribing the video, but have now fixed it). Let's just say that Attkisson has been doing good work for years against the tide of the media in general - I have seen some blogs and commenters suggest that a willingness to report something negative about Obama must be something new to her. It's not.]

And Obama loves them back.
Hot Air points us to a CBS report on Obama's fundraising. Ed Morrissey notes:
However, they did a good job in reporting the fact that Obama likes to rail about Wall Street greed but uses bundlers right out of Goldman Sachs. The disparity in fundraising between McCain and Obama with these well-connected Wall Street firms is eye-opening.
Let's go to the effort to do a little transcription work on that CBS video at Hot Air:
Sharyl Attkisson, CBS Correspondent: Like McCain, Obama's corporate donor list reads like a who's who of the Wall Street collapse, only some are giving more to Obama. Lots more.
Sheila Krumholz, Center for Responsive Politics: The Obama campaign has just vacuumed up the money in this cycle. Specifically from Goldman Sachs, Obama has received over $740,000 as compared to McCain's $220,000.
Attkisson: Not to mention that the former head of Goldman Sachs, Robert Rubin, is Obama's chief economic adviser, and two current executives are bundling for him. Bundlers are mega-fundraisers who critics say get special access.
Well. Here we are again. First we had Obama railing about McCain being in the pocket of Big Oil -- and then found out about Obama taking in more campaign donations from Exxon employees than McCain. So wemade the logo.
You know where this is heading, right?
Of course you do. It's not a trick question.
Goldman Sachs Loves Obama
Obama has been a model of transparency.
He's transparently phony.


  1. Transparently phony. Indeed.

    Same with "Occupy Petrified Adolescence" -- the movement Vanity Jones presciently touts as the "Autumn" movement of his movement's movement.

    "A movement whose time has come."

    How superior of them to be for 99% of the peoples everywhere and the environment and the movement that has brought the other movements to the movement so corporations could be gathered to stop the corporations. Can you imagine the level of sophistication such thinking requires?

    In the Chinese child-labor factories the begin each day with a rousing song. It's so very democratic. The enlightened lyric translates into English as follows.

    "Arise, arise, arise, millions of hearts with one mind."

    No wonder our proven betters (like Anita Dunn) have such a love for Mao.

    The globalization of 19th Century victorian utopias may be the mother of all globalizations.

    The international social justice movement appears to have fractally produced an endless looping of drum circles. Everywhere the drumbeat of "democracy democracy" because democracy is just not perfected enough. Thus the rote memorization of harpy rhetoric recited in myriad forms of an official "I am better than you because" catechism that would have Alan Watts howling with laughter should he ever get past the dumbfounding irony.

    What would these movementing boobs do should the pious pounding still and honest critical thinking begin?

    Rebels without a clue. No wonder these movements have become today's romper room of perpetually petrified adolescents.

    Our gainfully racketeering post modern universities and their usury partners seem to have little problem producing perfectly formed sinkers. Robbed of scholarly substance and unable to float on their own, these extruded technicians leave with an angry indoctrination.

    Thus the preening, cryptomalicious and co-dependent autocrats of the remarkable Atlanta video where John Lewis though invited was democratically denied the opportunity to speak to the democracy democracy.

    This too was run by petrified adolescents. Their hunger for condescension and conspicuous self-glorification on behalf of helpless others was in full display.

    Such is the kabuki dance to mask their conspiracy to bleed the peoples treasury and torment the innocent public in the name of perfecting them and rescuing the entire world so it may be restored its natural utopian state.
  2. Perhaps Goldman Sachs should be invetigated by the SEC for omitting the Obama White House as a controlled entity in their SEC filings as required by the new regulations since Enron.
  3. "I may not be a 'teabagger',but I sure know how to take care of Goldmans' sacks"

    ~Barokeydoke Hubris Obozo~

    Robbins Mitchell
  4. Robert Rubin, former co-Chairman of Goldman Sachs, was not just an Obama economic advisor. He was Bill Clinton's Treasury Secretary. And after leaving the Clinton Administration, took command of Citigroup.

Saturday, October 18, 2014

Saturday, October 18, 2014

ONE MORE KEY TO THE PUZZLE:We're in the best of hands.

HERE'S A LAUGH:Somebody's got to be embarrassed.

LEAVE IT TO THE LIBERAL MEDIA:Once again the NYT eats crow.

MANY WONDERED WHY NO PUSH BACK:Political operative again.


MORE MEDIA BLACKOUT:Don't forget the Pigford case that taxpayers several billions.This one may be worse because it reveals perhaps the depths to which the Obama Administration will go to pursue their destructive redistributionist philosophy.

A TAKEDOWN OF FEMINISM:I'm in agreement.

IS THE RECENT WALL STREET BOOM OVER?If it's over it's over. Probably is!

Monday, October 13, 2014

Monday, October 13, 2014

I'D SAY HE GOT THIS ABOUT RIGHT:Somebody, somewhere told liberals/progressives or whatever the hell these people call themselves these days, that you could manipulate the US economy and make it better. Where the deuce did they get that idea.  Hoover and FDR tried that for 11 long years in the '30s and only WWII bailed us out.  LBJ tried it in the '60's and we ended up with Nixon who tried it in the '70's and we ended up with Carter.  Clinton tried it in the '90's and we ended up with the subprime mortgage meltdown.  And now we have The Won, who's given us 6 years of no growth to go along with the foreign affairs debacles, the IRS debacle and the rest.  Scheesh, give it a rest guys, it'll take care of itself.

PROOF PROGRESSIVES ARE CERTIFIABLY INSANE:I mean seriously insane. Love to see the roster of moon bats who sign up for this trip. Puleeze, enough is enough.  Wonder if the idiot women who make this tour will wear hijabs when they visit Mosques.  Oh wait, they didn't mention visiting Mosques now did they?  Probably an oversight. Not.

NOT A FAN OF ANY OF THESE GUYS:Gates should never have taken the Job; Panenta is merely a Democrat hack. Both these "public servants" should have resigned over issues both swallowed.  So I consider them both to be "personal servants", not "public servants".

THERE'S A LOT OF TRUTH IN THIS BLOG:I have posted a response to this blog in the "Comments" section at the end of the blog. People don't like the Austrians's economic prescriptions because they involve "paying for your sins", often if not always accompanied by some pain.

FINAL WORD ON THIS ADMINISTRATION?:The comments section is interesting.

NOW THIS IS TRULY FUNNY: Really really funny.


New Muriel Bowser ad puts her words in others’ mouths

 October 13 at 1:31 PM  

This ad from D.C. mayoral candidate Muriel Bowser (D) features supporters telling her story, using her voice. (Muriel for Mayor via YouTube)


Intolerance 101

Having a Pulitzer Prize-winning syndicated columnist and noted TV commentator as a guest speaker would normally be considered a coup for an academic institution. But not if you’re Scripps College — and not if that speaker is George Will.
Consider this a teachable moment, one that speaks volumes about the increasing intolerance on American campuses to honest and open ­debate.
Scripps had invited Will as part of an annual program designed to present the notoriously liberal all-women’s college with a token conservative speaker.
But when the Washington Post pundit (whose column also appears on these pages) wrote a piece questioning the Obama administration’s statistics on campus sexual assaults, the predictable uproar ensued — and the liberal college, just as predictably, responded by closing its students to George Will’s arguments.
Scripps President Lori Bettison-Varga on Wednesday said Will was disinvited because sexual assault “is too important to be trivialized in a political debate or wrapped into a celebrity controversy.” We suspect George Will would agree, albeit for entirely different reasons.
As Will himself said after four US senators publicly denounced his column, “I think I take sexual assault much more seriously than you. Which is why I worry about definitions of that category of that crime that might, by their breadth, tend to trivialize it.”
Agree with Will’s position or not, it’s an entirely legitimate argument, and one that Scripps students would benefit from hearing and debating with him, if they feel so strongly. In other words, challenge Will to defend his position — don’t ban him from expressing it.
These days, however, the ears of our precious college students are thought by their liberal guardians to be so delicate they must be guarded from hearing any voice suggesting there might be other views. So when conservative speech makes liberals indignant, their answer is simply to ban it.
Maybe Scripps should follow the lead of Goddard College and book Mumia Abu-Jamal in Will’s place.
Plainly on our campuses, words of advice from a convicted cop-killer are deemed far more wise and welcome than those of a prize-winning conservative columnist.