Obama's friends

Find here a partial list of O's radical associates and appointees to various offices.

Sowell on poverty

Thomas Sowell has weighed in on the "claim" by dems that the Reagan policies and Republican policies in general over many decades have resulted in the backward slide of blacks in terms of housing, employment, incomes, et. al.:

The poverty rate among blacks was nearly cut in half in the 20 years prior to the 1960s, a record unmatched since then, despite the expansion of welfare state policies in the 1960s.

Unemployment among black 16 and 17-year-old males was 12 percent back in 1950. Yet unemployment rates among black 16 and 17-year-old males has not been less than 30 percent for any year since 1970 -- and has been over 40 percent in some of those years.

Not only was unemployment among blacks in general lower before the liberal welfare state policies expanded in the 1960s, rates of imprisonment of blacks were also lower then, and most black children were raised in two-parent families. At one time, a higher percentage of blacks than whites were married and working.

None of these facts fits liberal social dogmas.

While many politicians and "leaders" have claimed credit for black progress, no one seems to be willing to take the blame for the retrogressions represented by higher unemployment rates, higher crime rates, and higher rates of imprisonment today. Or for the disintegration of the black family, which survived centuries of slavery and generations of government-imposed discrimination in the Jim Crow era, but began coming apart in the wake of the expansion of the liberal welfare state and its accompanying social dogmas.

The time is long overdue to start looking beyond the prevailing political rhetoric to the hard realities.

It goes without saying that liberals do not want to make the connection between the back sliding of blacks in many ways since the welfare state was put in place by Johnson in the '60's, however that connection is obvious.  What all this means is that once the government begins to provide all sorts of programs to "make people's lives better", to level the playing field, and all the rest that goes with their philosophy on governing, the opposite result is usually the case.