Saturday, March 14, 2015

THE GRIEVANCE INDUSTRY WILL NOT LET IT HAPPEN: As long as there's money to be made from black poverty, it will continue.

FROM A FRIEND OF LEE'S, FOR PROSTATE CANCER VICTIMS:

Sean and Bobby,

As you know I have Prostate cancer. It's not severe, but it needs to be taken care of.  To that end, I'm going to have my prostate removed by "robotic" surgery on Tuesday morning, March 10th.

My Father had it.  My brother had it.  There's obviously a genetic component, so you boys are going to have to be more careful than most. But, every male will develop Prostate Cancer at some point in his life. Later is better than sooner and there's lots of easy things to do.

Prostate cancer releases a marker in the blood called Prostate Specific Antigen. Everyone with a Prostate as a PSA level. Normal is less that 1.0, but typically should be less than 0.5. In October, my PSA was 4.8, by Thanksgiving, it was 6.6. At which point a biopsy was performed and a more aggressive form of the cancer was found. I studied all the currently available treatment options, and, for my age determined surgery was the best course.

During the waiting period, I choose to experiment with myself, much as my Father had, and fighting the cancer with naturally available therapeutics.

In three months, my PSA went from 6.6 to 5.2.  This means I killed 25% of the cancer on my own in 3 months.  I decided to explain how I did so you can decide on a life style adaptation that will reduce your risk of getting the disease early.  I was on a crash course, so there is no need to be this aggressive unless or until your PSA  rises above 1.0.

No one lives forever.  As you progress through life, you can risk everything and lose it all but your health.  Bad health makes for a bad life.  A good life means good health.  This means taking good care of yourself both physically and mentally.

Prostate cancer effects 200,000 men a year. 38,000 deaths occur each year - a 20% mortality rate. African-Americans have the highest rate of Prostate cancer in the world, yet the disease in rare in Asia, Africa and Latin America.

What's the difference? Clearly, it has a lot to do with what you eat. In Asia, Africa and Latin America meat as a source of protein is expensive. Beans, chicken and fish are more typical protein sources.

No one knows what causes Prostate Cancer. However, the Prostate's functions are controlled by testosterone.  Prostate Cancer is therefore hormonal in nature.  In particular, it is the conversion of testosterone into dihydrotestosterone (DHT) that accelerates the disease.

Therefore, the reduction of testosterone reduces DHT reduces the chances of Prostate cancer.  Easier said than done, my boys.  However, we can target the conversion of testosterone into DHT because it's a chemical process - one you can affect by what you eat, drink and do.

If you want to cut to the chase, here's my recommendation.  Below the list you can read what I was doing and why I recommend this program.

1 hour aerobic exercise at least 5 days week

Diet
low in red meat
low in fat, esp meat fat
high in tomatoes, beans, soy, olive oil
high in carrots, bell peppers, pink grapefruit, dried apricots
More red wine than beer
Low amounts of corn oil, eg fewer "fries", corn chips, corn oil salad
Replace all corn oil with olive oil or avocado oil

Supplements - 1x per day

Full daily vitamin and mineral
with 200% MDR ZINC, calcium, Selenium   -- NO CADMIUM!!
Vitamin E 5mg
Vitamin D3 500-1000mg or 10 minutes of sunshine w/o sunscreen per day
Lycopene 15mg - can't be converted to Vitamin A, so very effect anti-oxidant
Genistein 8mg - from soybeans (or 8oz of tofu)
Saw Palmetto - 320mg of extract
Curcumin 1000mg - (Tumeric) curry powder
Omega 3 - EPA, DHA - 1200mg
Modified Citrus pectin - 5000mg
Red Rice Yeast - 500mg - lowers cholestral
Ibuprohin or aspirin - 350mg
MENTAL IMAGING

5 minutes per day imagine your immune system as the Spartans of ancient Greece. The enemy is at the gates and you ruthlessly slaughter any interlopers, including the Trojan Horse of cancer. You can beat it.  You will beat it.

STRESS REDUCTION

Cancer and stress are best friends. But they are more like Samson and Delilah. Eliminate one, and you cripple the other. Stress is anything that causes you to look in the mirror and not see a beautiful person. It isn't about money, or love, or "bad luck", its about how you REACT to them, or the lack of them.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's why.

EXERCISE, RED MEAT, FAT, CHOLESTEROL

First of all, I read a study done at UCLA in which men with Prostate Cancer did hard aerobic exercise at least 1 hour every day. Many saw reductions in the PSA as much as 50% in one year. These results were do to the chemicals that regulate the storage of fat and the creation of cholesterol. Lots of physical and intensely aerobic exercise has been know to reduce both fat and the kind of cholesterol you produce in your the liver. Exercise also uses up testosterone.  Therefore, a low fat, low cholesterol highly active life style is especially important in males.

So, just before Christmas I started running 6 miles a day, at least 5 days per week. I alternated this with bike riding for an hour.  I ran because the local winter lap pool was closed.

TOMATOES

Tomatoes are high in Lycopene.  Lycopene is a proven anti-oxidant present in our blood and a proven tumor inhibitor. Studies have shown that men with higher levels of lycopene are less likely to develop prostate cancer. In a study of 41 countries men who eat more than 6kcal of tomatoes per day had a significantly reduced risk of prostate cancer.

Also high in lycopene: carrots, bell peppers, watermelon, pink grapefruit, apricots

BEER

Beer lovers won't like this - beer produces more testosterone than other kinds of alcohol.

CORN OIL

Studies have shown that the fat from corn oil(alpha-linolenic acid-ALA) plays an important role in the conversion of testosterone into DHT - the bad stuff. Olive oil has 4x less ALA, with avocado oil being the best.

So, avoid large quantities of corn oil and products with corn oil in them. Yes, that means corn chips fried in corn oil.


SUPPLEMENTS:

VITAMIN E - 5mg day

A study of 30,000 men over 9 years showed that those who received high doses of Vitamin E supplements significantly reduced the risk of getting the disease. For those with the disease, Vitamin E helped the immune system to initiate apoptosis in cancer cells. Apoptosis is "programmed cell death" and is used by the immune system to eliminate corrupt cells (cancer).

VITAMIN D3 - 1000mg - 3x day - 3000mg (3000% MDR) - CAUTION!!!

A study in rats showed that a relative of Vitamin D suppressed tumor growth. In humans, the hormone version of Vitamin D inhibits the invasive growth properties of human Prostate cancer. Vitamin D3 is converted by the liver into the hormone version of Vitamin D.

CAUTION - too much Vitamin D interferes with the absorption of calcium. If you take high doses of Vitamin D, you need to also take calcium and zinc.

ZINC

Zinc plays an important role androgen (male/female hormone systems) metabolism. Estrogen reduces the uptake of zinc. Men with prostate cancer have higher levels of estrogen. Higher levels of estrogen prohibit the prostate from eliminating DHT -- the bad stuff -- from the prostate. Zinc inhibits the conversion of testosterone to DHT.  Zinc, like Saw Palmetto, prevents the binding of androgens and inhibits prolactin secretion.  Prolactin increases the uptake of testosterone in the prostate, causing it to produce more DHT - the bad stuff.   Zinc is an essential component of apoptosis (programmed cell death).

CADMIUM -- AVOID!

Cadmium is an antagonist to Zinc, so it has the opposite effects

GENISTEIN - soy concentrate with 8mg - 3x day = 24mg

Geninstein and Daidzein are the two major ingredients of soy attributed to the much lower rate of both Prostate cancer and cholesterol in Asia populations. Both have been shown to inhibit the conversion of testosterone into DHT - the bad stuff.


SAW PALMETTO - 288mg 3x day = 864mg 

Like EPA and DHA, the fatty acid in Saw Palmetto inhibits the conversion of testosterone into DHT, and, like Zinc, prevents the binding of androgens, limiting the production of prolaction. Much of the Saw Palmetto sold is just dried and powdered berries. I used the extract, which is more expensive, but I wanted to take a lot of it. Over long periods of time, powdered berries is probably Ok.

CURCUMIN(Tumeric) yielding 1000mg of Curcumin - 3x day = 3000mg

India has the lowest cancer rates in the world, and it is believed that curry, which contains TUMERIC is one reason. TUMERIC contains Curcumin. Studies have shown that Curcumin enhances the immune system's natural cancer-fighting chemistry.

OMEGA 3 - EPA and DHA 1200mg 3x day = 3600mg

These two fatty acids, along with the fatty acid contained in Saw Palmetto, inhibit the conversion of testosterone into DHT - the bad stuff.


MODIFIED CITRUS PECTIN - 5000mg in water 3x day = 15000mg

A study in rats showed that 1% by volume of drinking water laced with water soluble citrus pectin significantly reduced the spread of Prostate cancer outside the prostate (metastize). 1.6mg/liter reduced the tumor size of cancer, and has reduced the progression of the disease. It's also a well known agent for reducing cholesterol in the blood.


MENTAL IMAGING AND STRESS REDUCTION

I recently sent you the story called the "PLACEBO EFFECT". Part of the story was about a man with an incurable disease who "miraculously" cured himself because he BELIEVED he was taking a drug that would cure him. In Dr. Hutschneker's book THE WILL TO LIVE, he speaks about the important link between our emotions and our immune system.

Simply put, if you BELIEVE you can, you will. If you believe the worst will happen, it will. Olympic athletes use mental imaging to see themselves achieve their goals.  Reducing stress isn't eliminating things that cause stress, it's about learning how to control your body's response to those causes.

Learning to believe positively takes practice and exercise as much as it does to become a good musician. Like musicians, some of us are born that way. Most of us have to work at it.

In 1978 my father was given 6 months to live. His prostate cancer had escaped the prostate and gone into the bones of his hips and spine. He didn't do radiation. He didn't do chemotherapy. He removed testosterone from his body, treated himself with Vitamin E and lycopene - from carrots - that once turned him as orange as a ripe pumpkin - he over did it like you-know-who.

And he BELIEVED he could convince his immune system to do what it should have been doing all along. Doing mental imaging 5 minutes 5 times a day, fighting an all out war in his imagination.

He lived on for 16 years.

As he once wrote, don't read about all the bad things cancer does. What it does isn't important. What is important is to believe that your immune system has the power to fix these things, whatever they are.

He also said this:

"The sun is shining and its shining for you.  Believe it."


Your Dad,

THERE'S A LOT TO LOOK INTO HERE, BUT WILL ANYONE?

Net Neutrality as a Communist Coup Against the Internet

Even now some people are only just beginning to figure out that net neutrality is utterly malign. They would get the picture faster if they examined the mentality and objectives of thepeople behind it:

New internet regulations finally released by the Federal Communications Commission make 46 references to a group funded by billionaire George Soros and co-founded by a neo-Marxist.

The FCC released the 400-page document on Thursday, two weeks after it passed new regulations, which many fear will turn the internet into a public commodity and thereby stifle innovation.

“Leveling the playing field” in that way has been a clear goal of Free Press, a group dedicated to net neutrality which was founded in 2003. …

The term “Free Press” is mentioned 62 times in the regulations. Some are redundant mentions referring to the same Free Press activists’ comments in favor of more oversight. In total, the FCC cited Free Press’ pro-net neutrality arguments 46 times.

“Free Press” sounds like a good thing, right? But don’t forget we are living in Orwell’s 1984. By “Free Press,” they mean government-controlled press. One of the cofounders is University of Illinois professor Robert McChesney, who has been outspoken in his support for federal control of the Internet — and of news media in general. Free speech reeks of capitalism, you see:

“In the end, there is no real answer but to remove brick by brick the capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist principles,” McChesney wrote in a 2009 essay.

“Only government can implement policies and subsidies to provide an institutional framework for quality journalism,” he said.

“The news is not a commercial product. It is a public good, necessary for a self-governing society. Once we accept this, we can talk about the kind of media policies and subsidies we want,” McChesney once argued.

More McCheesy:

“Advertising is the voice of capital,” McChesney said in a 2009 interview with the Socialist Project. “We need to do whatever we can to limit capitalist propaganda, regulate it, minimize it, and perhaps even eliminate it.”

His objective appears clear enough: use government control of the media, including the Internet, to regulating content so as to advance Marxism, with the ultimate objective of inflicting on America what the Bolsheviks did to Russia.

Unsurprisingly, these people have Obama’s ear. Also unsurprisingly, they are extremely well funded by the big money ultra-left:

[Free Press] has received $2.2 million in donations from progressive billionaire George Soros’ Open Society Foundations and $3.9 million from the Ford Foundation.

If the history of communism is any guide, when these people finish consolidating control, advocating private ownership of property will earn you a bullet to the back of the head. Controlling the Internet is a major objective for them; “net neutrality” will put them in a position to achieve it.

Thursday, March 12, 2015

LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES:  This will never be brought under control until the printing press are.

THE DESPICABLE ERIC HOLDER Holder and Obama are a tough combination for aspiring black politicians to overcome in the future. Their legacy is highly racists and ultimately divisive.

ZERO HEDGE ANALYSIS PRETTY INTERESTING: Gotta love David Stockman, the evil genius. The message: Debt, debt, nothing but debt and most of it unserviceable.

March 7, 2015

Cost of food 1970 http://www.thepeoplehistory.com/70sfood.html

Cost of food 1920's

cost of food 1990's

THE LIBERTARIAN VIEW OF THE WAR OF 1812 Does this make Obama a libertarian?

FLIMSY BIO Not much here,but what can you expect?

March 6, 2015

THESE ARE PATRIOTS And now we are "led" by a grifter from who knows where. The shame of it all is almost unbearable.

SUCCINCT, AND TO THE POINT: As clear a statement of conservative values as one is apt to find ever.

SADLY, MSM IS TOTALLY CORRUPTED Hard to know where we go from here!

Monday, March 2, 2015

CHRONY CAPITALISM BY CLINTONS These people do not play by the rules. They are third world operatives.

THE VIRUS IS STILL WITH US  Obama is a socialist pure and simple. He's no more a Christian than Putin and for that matter, any Jew is a Christian.



NOVEL PERSPECTIVE ON SOCIALISM

A Marxist View of the Democrats' Entitlement Economy

By Michael Bargo, Jr.

Karl Marx, considered the founding figure in the rise of communism, divided all persons into two classes: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx said that the bourgeoisie control all the wealth, they own the factories and other means of economic production, and they exploit and abuse the proletariat to profit off of their productivity or surplus value. 
In the U.S. political arena, the Democrat Party has used the language of Marx in the sense of stating, as Marx did, that workers should enjoy better pay, a decent standard of living, and good health care.  They are the political party that understands the needs of workers, so they say in every campaign.  They are the defenders of the rights of Marx’s proletariat.

The one great characteristic of Marx’s theory of society is that it has is a great flaw, in that Marx only spoke about the private sector of the economy, he never talked about the public sector.  But this oversight may be due to the fact that industrialized society was just beginning in the Western world when Marx wrote. He saw the new rise of capitalism/industrialism as having exploitive characteristics.
It is important to understand that Karl Marx never spoke of food stamps, welfare, and free health care as a remedy for the exploitation of the worker.  He held that workers should unite together and run the government so that all are treated equally and no one class exploits the other; that the wages and benefits to workers should be fair and equitable. So when Democrats take the language of Marxism and use it to enable entitlement creation they are not following Marx’s theory of class society.
In the past eighty years Democrats chose to use the rhetoric of Marxism to construct an entitlement state. Since FDR the Democrat Party has also used its political power to expand government’s control of all aspects of life. This expansion has long outgrown its mission of reducing exploitation of workers and has created a new form of social exploitation. In short, Democrats have replaced Marx’s two classes, the bourgeoisie and proletariat, with two new, different classes based on government control of the economy and society. These two Democrat-created classes are the Democrat Bourgeoisie and the Entitlementariat.
To test if this Marxist view of the Democrats’ entitlement economy fits the economic and social facts, it is useful to review the social and economic status of the Democrat bourgeoisie and the entitlementariat.
The term entitlementariat is a good one, since those who are unfortunate enough to be members of this socio-economic class suffer the same abuses as proletarians under Marx’s notion of capitalism. One way to see if there is a fit is to simply exchange the word “Democrat” for capitalist and entitlementarian for proletarian in Marx’s work Das Capital. The term “Democrat power” can also be substituted for “wealth.” Since Democrats achieve power through wealth distribution, the term “entitlements” can be substituted for “capital.”
Marx wrote that under capitalism: “It follows therefore that in proportion as capital [entitlement] accumulates, the situation of the worker [entitlementarian] be his payment high or low, must grow worse… It [Democrat entitlements] makes an accumulation of misery a necessary condition, corresponding to the accumulation of wealth. [Democrat political power]… Accumulation of wealth [entitlements] at one pole is, therefore, at the same time the accumulation of misery, the torment of labour, slavery, ignorance, brutalization, and moral degradation as the opposite pole, i.e., on the side of the class that produces its own product as capital [Democrat power]. 
Marx spoke of the degradation of the proletariat under capitalism in terms that are identical to the degradation suffered by minority entitlementarians under Democrat rule in big cities: “…they distort the worker into a fragment of a man, they degrade him to the level of an appendage of a [Democrat political] machine, they destroy the actual content of his labour by turning it into a torment; they alienate from him the intellectual potentialities of the labour process… they drag his wife and child beneath the wheels of the juggernaut of capital [entitlements].” (Das Capital, Chapter 25, Part 4. “The General Law of capitalist Accumulation.”)
Democrats create highly segregated communities whose boundaries are defined by racism so that they could represent minority neighborhoods in elections. All racially segregated communities are under Democrat control and its residents suffer very high rates of poverty, single motherhood, crime, high dropout rates, high unemployment, zero economic growth, misery, and death. And the solutions Democrats always put forth to correct these social ills are always more community programs and entitlements. These programs only serve to expand their political control of the entitlementariat through dependency. The benefit the Democrat bourgoisie gets is political power. The racial segregation found in big cities is proof that the Democrat bourgeoisie creates and maintains the entitlementariat. Recently illegal immigration has been used to create anHispanic entitlementariat.
Through these tactics Democrats have moved the pendulum of exploitation away from the Marxist private sector back to the public sector. Like the Medieval power structure, Democrats base theirs on political boundaries which allows them to the electorate, and the more the electorate are forced to become members of the urban entitlementariat the more power Democrats have.
The entitlementariat may have replaced the proletariat but then one can ask if Marx’s bourgeoisie has been replaced by the Democrat Bourgeoisie. The answer is “yes” since Democrats, not Republicans, have created the entitlementariat and they have complete power over them. And just by coincidence they use this power to transfer the wealth of the nation to themselves through campaign contributors from public sector unions and accumulation of personal wealth. 
Everywhere Democrat bourgeoisie are in power, the middle-class workers are exploited and subjugated, while those who are in poverty are forced into the entitlementariat. In Illinois, a prime example of a state dominated by Democrats, we can see what Democrats have done to transfer wealth away from the middle class in order to make themselves elite bourgeoisie and support the entitlementariat. Each household in Chicago now “owes” the Democrat bourgeoisie $88,000 for their pensions and bond debt. This amount increases weekly. And most of this debt was created through public pension funds that go only to members of the Democrat bourgeoisie. So middle-class workers have to subsidize the Democrat bourgeoisie’ retirement of leisure. Elite Democrat Bourgeoisie such as Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and the Clintons all earn millions through their government “service.” 
Up to now, since America is a wealthy country, it was temporarily able to afford to subsidize the entitlementariat. But no longer. The money needed to sustain the entitlementariat is obtained from national debt which will, in the long run, result in the oppression of the working class. 

Karl Marx, considered the founding figure in the rise of communism, divided all persons into two classes: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx said that the bourgeoisie control all the wealth, they own the factories and other means of economic production, and they exploit and abuse the proletariat to profit off of their productivity or surplus value. 
In the U.S. political arena, the Democrat Party has used the language of Marx in the sense of stating, as Marx did, that workers should enjoy better pay, a decent standard of living, and good health care.  They are the political party that understands the needs of workers, so they say in every campaign.  They are the defenders of the rights of Marx’s proletariat.
The one great characteristic of Marx’s theory of society is that it has is a great flaw, in that Marx only spoke about the private sector of the economy, he never talked about the public sector.  But this oversight may be due to the fact that industrialized society was just beginning in the Western world when Marx wrote. He saw the new rise of capitalism/industrialism as having exploitive characteristics.
It is important to understand that Karl Marx never spoke of food stamps, welfare, and free health care as a remedy for the exploitation of the worker.  He held that workers should unite together and run the government so that all are treated equally and no one class exploits the other; that the wages and benefits to workers should be fair and equitable. So when Democrats take the language of Marxism and use it to enable entitlement creation they are not following Marx’s theory of class society.
In the past eighty years Democrats chose to use the rhetoric of Marxism to construct an entitlement state. Since FDR the Democrat Party has also used its political power to expand government’s control of all aspects of life. This expansion has long outgrown its mission of reducing exploitation of workers and has created a new form of social exploitation. In short, Democrats have replaced Marx’s two classes, the bourgeoisie and proletariat, with two new, different classes based on government control of the economy and society. These two Democrat-created classes are the Democrat Bourgeoisie and the Entitlementariat.
To test if this Marxist view of the Democrats’ entitlement economy fits the economic and social facts, it is useful to review the social and economic status of the Democrat bourgeoisie and the entitlementariat.
The term entitlementariat is a good one, since those who are unfortunate enough to be members of this socio-economic class suffer the same abuses as proletarians under Marx’s notion of capitalism. One way to see if there is a fit is to simply exchange the word “Democrat” for capitalist and entitlementarian for proletarian in Marx’s work Das Capital. The term “Democrat power” can also be substituted for “wealth.” Since Democrats achieve power through wealth distribution, the term “entitlements” can be substituted for “capital.”
Marx wrote that under capitalism: “It follows therefore that in proportion as capital [entitlement] accumulates, the situation of the worker [entitlementarian] be his payment high or low, must grow worse… It [Democrat entitlements] makes an accumulation of misery a necessary condition, corresponding to the accumulation of wealth. [Democrat political power]… Accumulation of wealth [entitlements] at one pole is, therefore, at the same time the accumulation of misery, the torment of labour, slavery, ignorance, brutalization, and moral degradation as the opposite pole, i.e., on the side of the class that produces its own product as capital [Democrat power]. 
Marx spoke of the degradation of the proletariat under capitalism in terms that are identical to the degradation suffered by minority entitlementarians under Democrat rule in big cities: “…they distort the worker into a fragment of a man, they degrade him to the level of an appendage of a [Democrat political] machine, they destroy the actual content of his labour by turning it into a torment; they alienate from him the intellectual potentialities of the labour process… they drag his wife and child beneath the wheels of the juggernaut of capital [entitlements].” (Das Capital, Chapter 25, Part 4. “The General Law of capitalist Accumulation.”)
Democrats create highly segregated communities whose boundaries are defined by racism so that they could represent minority neighborhoods in elections. All racially segregated communities are under Democrat control and its residents suffer very high rates of poverty, single motherhood, crime, high dropout rates, high unemployment, zero economic growth, misery, and death. And the solutions Democrats always put forth to correct these social ills are always more community programs and entitlements. These programs only serve to expand their political control of the entitlementariat through dependency. The benefit the Democrat bourgoisie gets is political power. The racial segregation found in big cities is proof that the Democrat bourgeoisie creates and maintains the entitlementariat. Recently illegal immigration has been used to create anHispanic entitlementariat.
Through these tactics Democrats have moved the pendulum of exploitation away from the Marxist private sector back to the public sector. Like the Medieval power structure, Democrats base theirs on political boundaries which allows them to the electorate, and the more the electorate are forced to become members of the urban entitlementariat the more power Democrats have.
The entitlementariat may have replaced the proletariat but then one can ask if Marx’s bourgeoisie has been replaced by the Democrat Bourgeoisie. The answer is “yes” since Democrats, not Republicans, have created the entitlementariat and they have complete power over them. And just by coincidence they use this power to transfer the wealth of the nation to themselves through campaign contributors from public sector unions and accumulation of personal wealth. 
Everywhere Democrat bourgeoisie are in power, the middle-class workers are exploited and subjugated, while those who are in poverty are forced into the entitlementariat. In Illinois, a prime example of a state dominated by Democrats, we can see what Democrats have done to transfer wealth away from the middle class in order to make themselves elite bourgeoisie and support the entitlementariat. Each household in Chicago now “owes” the Democrat bourgeoisie $88,000 for their pensions and bond debt. This amount increases weekly. And most of this debt was created through public pension funds that go only to members of the Democrat bourgeoisie. So middle-class workers have to subsidize the Democrat bourgeoisie’ retirement of leisure. Elite Democrat Bourgeoisie such as Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and the Clintons all earn millions through their government “service.” 
Up to now, since America is a wealthy country, it was temporarily able to afford to subsidize the entitlementariat. But no longer. The money needed to sustain the entitlementariat is obtained from national debt which will, in the long run, result in the oppression of the working class. 

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/03/a_marxist_view_of_the_democrats_entitlement_economy.html#ixzz3TFp0hCDc
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Friday, February 27, 2015

AN IMPORTANT EXPLANATION OF ISIL Everyone needs to read this thoroughly researched and truly seminal piece on the Islamic threat posed by the madmen from ISIL.

MEASURING SUCCESS An example of racial measurement of success, by a racist.

ONE MORE TAKEOVER Progressive forces are on the march, all part of Obama's legacy of transformation.

BREITBART EXONNERATED OVER PIGFORD CASE But another example of the perfidious Media Matters and all other lefties. They are beneath contempt.

Monday, February 23, 2015

ISLAM'S IN NEED OF SERIOUS REFORMATION Churchill's description of Islam prevails tothis day.   A timeless article.

How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!  Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.  The effects are apparent in many countries.  Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.  A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.  The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property—either as a child, a wife, or a concubine—must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.  Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities.  Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die.  But the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it.  No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.  Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proseltyzing faith.  It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science—the science against which it had vainly struggled—the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.

WHERE ARE THE ROOT CAUSES? What exactly are the Repubs supposed to offer to win these voters?


THE PIGS ARE SQUEALING Watch academia resist reforms and learn to live within a budget.

LI9BERALS/SOCIALISTS/COMMUNISTS They are all from the same bolt of cloth.

REAGAN AND GIULIANI There's really np argument here. It's about the progressive/liberal vs free market/capitalist.

GOVERNMENT CONTROL OF THE INTERNET? Comcast deserves a lot of attention -- a perfect example of crony capitalism at work.

LIB PRESS AT IT AGAIN Dana Milbank's shelf life has expired. Enough already.