Monday, November 12, 2012

Youth will be served

This video is predictable.  Schools no longer educate children.  They indoctrinate them.

Tags: Voting , Barack Obama , Students , Boston
Join the Debate
320 Comments So Far
« Previous12345Next »
jdonovan956 Wrote:3 hours ago (1:35 PM)
amazing--the people who pay their bills want Romney
HopefulAmerican Wrote:2 hours ago (1:47 PM)
Yep I've paid all my bills all by myself for all of my life and yes I wanted Romney. I wanted Morality and Spirituality to survive in this country and it hasn't and won't under this president.
LibertyBell777 Wrote:59 minutes ago (3:42 PM)
I pay my bills all by myself and I voted Obama. What's your point?

I guess if you hear that people voting for Obama want a handout enough, you start to believe it - even if it isn't true. Poor people vote for issues that are important to them just like everyone else. I've never seen a party that demonizes our working and poor more than the Republican party - and then turn and try to claim moral superiority.

Also, Morality and Spirituality don't need government interference to survive. The fact that you think that is sad. Not forcing your beliefs on others doesn't make you less spiritual. It just means you believe in individual choice. Forcing your beliefs on others is like spiritual rape. God doesn't force himself on others, so...
Leslie96 Wrote:3 hours ago (1:10 PM)
American history and social studies is lost in the liberals dream world of equality and diversity! To make all acceptable no matter what, equalize the playing field....sadly, it is America who loses herself in the lack of education...history has a way of repeataing itself and if these goobers don't know anything about our country, how the government works, or our history...we are doomed to lose her to idiots! Teachers...why are you not passionate about a single subject and then teach that single subject? Parents...why are you not teaching your children their history (not fables, not lies...real history)..because of the breakdown of family..no sitting around the dinner table these days talking....Lady Liberty cries....
LibertyBell777 Wrote:52 minutes ago (3:49 PM)
Only Republicans think equality and diversity is a bad thing. Are you a teacher? An expert on history? Obviously not, since you don't even have a clue what America's founding principles are...Liberty and Justice for all (not just people that look like and agree with you).
HopefulAmerican Wrote:3 hours ago (12:54 PM)
America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves. ~ Abraham Lincoln
America has chosen a party that demands every taxpayer be complicit in the federally funded slaughter of the pre-born. We have exalted a party that seeks to – and in many was ways has already done so – enshrine into law the celebration of sexual deviancy and mock marriage.
The haughty peoples of four states have said to God, “Marriage is as we say it is, not as you have ordered it.” And so, though removed from truth, as east is from west, they have, at the ballot box, affirmed moral disorder.
These college students just prove this point.
t-amberg Wrote:4 hours ago (12:05 PM)
They definitely get a lot of tv time, they are great at regurgitating Obama ads.. and not much more.
Which is scarier, these are college students.. or that they vote?
954 Wrote:6 hours ago (10:31 AM)
I believe all voters should be given a simple test proving a rudimentary knowledge of government before they are allowed to cast a ballot. I would pay money to see the looks on the faces of those twits in the video when they're told they can't vote because they failed. That would be inspiring.
zwheaton Wrote:14 hours ago (1:48 AM)
This just in... who cares?
Leslie96 Wrote:3 hours ago (1:11 PM)
And wow, like you're not part of the problem?
B.T. Wrote:16 hours ago (12:07 AM)
Dear God help us.
Dixiedrifter Wrote:19 hours ago (9:07 PM)
Imagine, people like this will soon be elected to positions of authority, as a consequence, these brain-dead nitwits will determine/influence the direction our country will take. Thank God I am a sixty-something, when the sheet begins to hit the fan, I pray for senility and won't know the difference. These empty heads think attending college and receiving a degree, is tantamount to participating in an episode of "American Idol". They are oblivious to the fact their generation will likely live a majority of their remaining adult life in squalor and poverty. The present direction our country is headed - is unsustainable. What's happened with today's youth, it's unbelievable. There are four-legged creatures among us exhibiting more sense?
BFANCI Wrote:1 hour ago (3:38 PM)
My dogs are smarter than these "students"!
jalexander770 Wrote:Nov 11, 2012 10:49 AM
This is whatt as known as the dumbing up of America!
zwheaton Wrote:14 hours ago (1:49 AM)
I believe "what" is spelled with one T
MoreFreedom Wrote:Nov 11, 2012 10:01 AM
I enjoy the guy who has a Freudian slip saying Obama will give families lower incomes. He probably didn't even realize he said it. The guy knows the reality, but like many liberal, he denies reality because it conflicts with the vision in his head. But it slipped out anyway.
zwheaton Wrote:14 hours ago (1:49 AM)
You're right. We should increase military spending 4 trillion dollars... That'll fix things.
Leslie96 Wrote:3 hours ago (1:12 PM)
yep, cuz a weak country is an easy country! Yay....I say abolish the military totally...then get ready to kiss someones raised backside bubba!
bob sledd Wrote:Nov 11, 2012 9:08 AM
In order to VOTE, you need to have an Ownership Stake in the Country.
For example... You need to pay TAXES for starters, or be a member of the Military.
Unless you have skin in the game, you will vote for , you know, free stuff
John5507 Wrote:Nov 11, 2012 10:10 AM
Do you mean INCOME taxes? Because unless those people don't eat , buy anything or go anywhere, they're paying taxes. FYI, Mitt and Ann Romney haven't paid INCOME taxes for a very long time either so I guess they have no "skin in the game"? thurston's income, adjusted for elections (he didn't take almost 2MILLION in deductions he was entitled to in order to increase his percentage. hes running for office for pete's sake), was not earned by working so he pays a ridiculously low 12 % while working men pay much more.
dolo Wrote:21 hours ago (7:17 PM)
. Are you kidding? Where did you get your information? don't you have enough sense to know that was a campaign ploy of one of the many Harry Reid fabrications. Why don't you check to see the truth, check and not from MSM. Check the facts or shut up.
KATZ Wrote:Nov 11, 2012 8:45 AM
This is precisely why the mentally impaired and illiterate need to be kept far from the voting booth. This bunch of stooges is an excellent example of the wreck commonly called 'public education.' Most likely every one of these boobs can put a condom on a cucumber, unfortunately they cannot spell the word 'condom.' Why should we dump yet more money into this 'education' system that is a total waste of time?
vkarthik Wrote:Nov 11, 2012 12:51 AM
Apart from republicans no one will take this video seriously considering the fact Republican sent candidates like Palin, George Bush who are as dumb as these guys lol
jalexander770 Wrote:Nov 11, 2012 10:46 AM
You sound like the people in the video. Clueless!
dolo Wrote:21 hours ago (7:19 PM)
Do you know that or as most voters you just spout off and have no idea what the hell you are talking about
NoPontification Wrote:Nov 10, 2012 10:08 PM
From H. W. Prentis (often misattributed to Alexander Fraser Tytler). Observation about democracies planting the seeds of their own demise):

"The historical cycle seems to be: From bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to selfishness; from selfishness to apathy; from apathy to dependency; and from dependency back to bondage once more."


.
Incredulous2 Wrote:Nov 10, 2012 11:05 PM
But it feels so, so, so revolutionary!
July1776 Wrote:Nov 10, 2012 9:53 PM
When the Liberation Army of the Peoples Rebublic of China invades the U.S., we well know why......
Barbara3135 Wrote:Nov 10, 2012 9:26 PM
We have these morons to thank for the recent reelection of a man who doesn't know much more than they do about the economy. It's all feel-good stuff. The Obama admin are a bunch of LIARS. Everything they do has to be rewritten to be exactly the party line and it doesn't matter if it doesn't make any sense, because their supporters re too stupid to think for themselves. I feel like taking our money out of the stock market and putting it under the mattress at least until we can find another country to move to that won't think that we have to support an underclass who can outvote us and vote themselves all the entitlements.
goshawk Wrote:Nov 11, 2012 4:46 AM
Barbara,

That is what the big money guys are doing. Taking their money out of the stock market and hiding it elsewhere. If anyone has any savings at all, guard it in every way you can. Ovomit has already said he will take all 401K's and wants access to all bank accounts.
factsrknown Wrote:Nov 10, 2012 6:07 PM
Just goes to show you what happens to so many in the public schools now.
Incredulous2 Wrote:Nov 10, 2012 5:47 PM
Were we to expect anything more of these yokels? Certainly, no one could have expected less.
Eileen for Freedom/Liberty Wrote:Nov 10, 2012 4:41 PM
As sheep to the slaughter...they have been led.

They think unemployment is high now? Wait...just wait...until all the companies who cannot afford Obamacare go under and/or cutback to survive.

Then we can call them the enablers of the destruction of America within...because they were ignorant of the truths and refused to believe the truth...that the Muslim N' Chief living in our White House...has an agenda and it is not to preserve America and it's people...but to destroy her from within!

GOD WILL PROTECT ALL BELIEVERS...WHO DIDN'T VOTE FOR HIM!
jolszewski Wrote:Nov 10, 2012 12:02 PM
Funny if it wasn't so sad.

Poor little trolls.
BamaBoySlim Wrote:Nov 10, 2012 10:50 AM
So this is what "we the people" look like now... No wonder Obama was re-elected; hell, I might run myself.
KManInLaLa Wrote:15 hours ago (1:03 AM)
Run--for your life!! For the border! Let the good guys get outta Dodge!

How long before it gets truly Orwellian? For God's sake, don't give Obama a copy of "1984"; he'll read it and say, "You can DO that?"
Barry151 Wrote:Nov 10, 2012 10:28 AM
Squirrels are easily distracted by shiny objects.
YassirSanchez Wrote:Nov 10, 2012 8:39 AM
I am proud to say that my government students are not this stupid. At least about Government. Now if I could just make them see that Obama is a wolf in sheeps clothing.

But at least they know the Constitution.
Johnnyp Wrote:Nov 10, 2012 8:09 AM
truly shocking and sad
Mark in CA Wrote:Nov 10, 2012 2:25 AM
I wasn't sure. Off the top of my head I guessed 435 members in the House of Representatives because it sounded like a number I had heard before and was pleased that I was right. But I am afraid I could not name all the amendments. I did recall that I am guaranteed the right to own a gun so I can shoot tyrants. Oh, and I can say what I like, which is nice too. But I must read the Constitution again. It has been too long.
« Previous12345Next »
 

Saturday, November 10, 2012

Friday, November 9, 2012

VIRTUAL ROME

THIS TRULY AMAZING DIGITALLY CONSTRUCTED VIRTUAL TOUR BY VIDEO OF ROME IN 320 A.D. WHEN AT THE PEAK OF ITS POPULATION (1 MILLION).  This site here which offered the video below features many free online courses.  Quite amazing.

Republicans and the hispanic vote

Put to rest any thought that the hispanic vote can ever be a factor in the conservative coalition.  It's not going to happen despite what Charles Krautheimer or any other wishful dreaming pundit thinks.  The truth is the hispanics are a natural constituency for big government, pro union, statist economies, which is mostly what one sees south of the border, down Mexico way and in other Latin American countries.  The only way to deal with the growing flood of hispanic voters is to severely restrict immigration and play hardball on amnesty.  Since that's not likely to happen Republicans should concentrate on increasing their percentage of the white vote and don't waste any more time chasing the rainbow coalition.  Read it and weep.

Text   
The call for Republicans to discard their opposition to immigration amnesty will grow deafening in the wake of President Obama’s victory. Hispanics supported Obama by a margin of nearly 75 percent to 25 percent, and may have provided important margins in some swing states. If only Republicans relented on their Neanderthal views regarding the immigration rule of law, the message will run, they would release the inner Republican waiting to emerge in the Hispanic population.  
If Republicans want to change their stance on immigration, they should do so on the merits, not out of a belief that only immigration policy stands between them and a Republican Hispanic majority. It is not immigration policy that creates the strong bond between Hispanics and the Democratic party, but the core Democratic principles of a more generous safety net, strong government intervention in the economy, and progressive taxation. Hispanics will prove to be even more decisive in the victory of Governor Jerry Brown’s Proposition 30, which raised upper-income taxes and the sales tax, than in the Obama election.
And California is the wave of the future. A March 2011 poll by Moore Information found that Republican economic policies were a stronger turn-off for Hispanic voters in California than Republican positions on illegal immigration. Twenty-nine percent of Hispanic voters were suspicious of the Republican party on class-warfare grounds — “it favors only the rich”; “Republicans are selfish and out for themselves”; “Republicans don’t represent the average person”– compared with 7 percent who objected to Republican immigration stances.
spoke last year with John Echeveste, founder of the oldest Latino marketing firm in southern California, about Hispanic politics. “What Republicans mean by ‘family values’ and what Hispanics mean are two completely different things,” he said. “We are a very compassionate people, we care about other people and understand that government has a role to play in helping people.”
And a strong reason for that support for big government is that so many Hispanics use government programs. U.S.-born Hispanic households in California use welfare programs at twice the rate of native-born non-Hispanic households. And that is because nearly one-quarter of all Hispanics are poor in California, compared to a little over one-tenth of non-Hispanics. Nearly seven in ten poor children in the state are Hispanic, and one in three Hispanic children is poor, compared to less than one in six non-Hispanic children. One can see that disparity in classrooms across the state, which are chock full of social workers and teachers’ aides trying to boost Hispanic educational performance.
The idea of the “social issues” Hispanic voter is also a mirage. A majority of Hispanics now support gay marriage, a Pew Research Center poll from last month found. The Hispanic out-of-wedlock birth rate is 53 percent, about twice that of whites.
The demographic changes set into motion by official and de facto immigration policy favoring low-skilled over high-skilled immigrants mean that a Republican party that purports to stand for small government and free markets faces an uncertain future.  

Thursday, November 8, 2012

Melanie Phillips speaks out


Melanie Phillips, a much admired spokesman for true conservatism in England, and who has a following herein the US, speaks out on the meaning of the election.

The greatest satisfaction today over the re-election of Obama is not being felt in the Democratic Party. It is not being felt among the media, who are no longer objective observers but have turned instead into corrupt partisans who ruthlessly censored the truth about Obama and helped peddle his demonising propaganda about his opponent. It is not being felt among the gloating, drooling decadents of the western left who now scent a great blood-letting of all who dare defy their secular inquisition. No, the greatest satisfaction is surely being felt in Iran.
With four more years of Obama in the White House, Iran can now be sure that it will be able to complete its infernal construction of a genocide bomb to use against the Jews and the west. World War Three has now come a lot closer.
It is said that, with likely gridlock in Congress over domestic issues, Obama will concentrate on foreign policy. We should all shudder. So far, Obama has empowered Iran to destabilise the region; supported Islamist takeovers in Egypt and Libya; is backing al Qaeda affiliates in Syria; refused to come to the aid of Americans being attacked by al Qaeda in Benghazi as a result of which four American officials were murdered; and hung Israel out to dry against its genocidal Palestinian attackers.
report last month that Obama was secretly negotiating with the Iranian regime took on an even more incendiary aspect a few days ago with a claim that these negotiations were being led by his close friend and adviser, Valerie Jarrett.
If Jarrett was indeed involved, that should strike a deep chill into anyone who has not joined the lemming-like leap over the edge of the western cliff. For Iranian-born Jarrett – who Obama has admitted he consults before he takes any decision and who has been said to act as his ‘spine’ -- is a far-leftist with roots deep in the corrupt Chicago Democratic machine. Indeed, Jarrett has been credited with originally smoothing Obama’s entry into Chicago’s political elite, and is now said to be – despite her controversial background -- the most influential person in his circle.  
 There have also been claims that she advised Obama against killing Osama bin Laden, which although unsubstantiated are all too credible. If this wholly ill-equipped and sinister individual really has been leading secret negotiations with Iran – raising the fear that far from preventing Iranian nuclear terrorism Obama intends to allow the regime a face saving compromise under cover of which it will finish building its nuclear weapon – then Obama’s perfidy against the west really is as bad as some of us feared from the start.
Four years ago, America put into the White House a sulky narcissist with an unbroken history of involvement in thuggish, corrupt, far-left, black power, Jew-bashing, west-hating politics. In his autobiography, Obama himself described his mentor, the communist agitator Frank Marshall Davis, as being a promoter of  black power; in 1995 Obama went on the Million Man March organised by the black power activist and radical antisemite Louis Farrakhan; for twenty years, Obama belonged to a church whose pastor, Jremiah Wright, peddled antisemitic conspiracy theories, denounced black assimilation into white society and in June 2009 claimed that Jews were controlling Obama and were preventing Wright from talking to him.
Obama’s agenda has been crystal clear from the get-go: to increase the power of the state over the citizen at home, and to neutralise American power abroad. Four more years of this and he’ll almost certainly have succeeded.  The impact upon western security could be cataclysmic.
Britain and the Europeans love Obama because they think he will end American exceptionalism and turn the US into a pale shadow of themselves. What they don’t realise is that, all but lobotomised by consumerist rights, state dependency, victim culture, sentimentality, post-religion, post-nationalism and post-Holocaust and Empire guilt, Britain and Europe are themselves fast going down the civilisational tubes.
Romney lost because he refused to provide an alternative to any of this for fear of being labelled a warmonger, flint-heart or social reactionary. He refused to engage with any of the issues that made this Presidential election so truly momentous. Up against the bullying of the totalitarian left, he ran for cover. He played safe, and as a result only advertised his own weakness and dishonesty. Well, voters can smell inconsistency from a mile away; they call it untrustworthiness, and they are right.   
Romney lost because, like Britain’s Conservative Party, the Republicans just don’t understand that America and the west are being consumed by a culture war. In their cowardice and moral confusion, they all attempt to appease the enemies within. And from without, the Islamic enemies of civilisation stand poised to occupy the void.
With the re-election of Obama, America now threatens to lead the west into a terrifying darkness.

Elite funders of the Democrat Party

Joel Kotkin weighs in here with a timely analysis of the new and powerful "elites" now funding the Democrat Party and Obama.  This wealthy claque of knowledge entrepreneurs is now beginning to assert itself by politically financing its ideas of how to solve the world's problems at least  as they see them.  Their agenda is clean energy, environmentalism, redressing racial and income inequalities, generally speaking that of the Obama Democrat Party.  In conjunction with Hollywood, academia and the administrative state regulators and enforcers, these newly wealthy represent post industrial progressives and sound very much like the old progressive descendants of the Woodrow Wilson movement.  Think micromanaging Mayor Mike Bloomberg, himself a technology billionaire,  and you have a pretty good fix on who these people are and how they think.  Since they are fabulously wealthy, made so by the clean business of packaging, manipulating and moving information, they are not in touch with nor sympathize with the industrial age types like energy industry titans or any others who live in the"dirty" world of heavy industry and the like.  Like all elites, they fervently believe they know best and therefore  are destined to help the lower orders lead better, more productive and happier lives.  This kind of thinking is a slightly more benevolent version of that which prevailed for 80 years planning and destroying the economy of the USSR, and for much briefer period of time in fascist Germany and Italy.

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

A phyric victory at best

So Obama won reelection.  The recriminations, finger pointing and scapegoating by Republicans begins.  It's not that difficult to understand.  Here's what WSJ has to say about the election:


Mr. Obama’s campaign stitched together a shrunken but still decisive version of his 2008 coalition—single women, the young and culturally liberal, government and other unions workers, and especially minority voters.
He said little during the campaign about his first term and even less about his plans for a second. Instead his strategy was to portray Mitt Romney as a plutocrat and intolerant threat to each of those voting blocs. No contraception for women. No green cards for immigrants. A return to Jim Crow via voter ID laws. No Pell grants for college.
This was all a caricature even by the standards of modern politics. But it worked with brutal efficiency—the definition of winning ugly. Mr. Obama was able to patch together just enough of these voting groups to prevail even as he lost independents and won only 40% of the overall white vote, according to the exit polls. His campaign’s turnout machine was as effective as advertised in getting Democratic partisans to the polls. . . . There are few permanent victories or defeats in American politics, and Tuesday wasn’t one of them. The battle for liberty begins anew this morning.


Obama's win will prove to be a phyric victory at best.  Our sour economy will not improve. Al qaeda will not go away. The debt and deficit realities will not improve. He won a popularity contest because  his opponent lacked charisma and charm.  He won because he is a celebrity president in an age when the masses are into being entertained and amused before all else.  He won because colleges are churning out illiterate politically correct products especially about economics and history.  He won because blacks vote based on pigmentation, not character.  He won because single women want government hand outs.  He won because of identity politics. He won because the media is deeply in the tank for any democrat candidate.  He won because government is an industry to democrats and a bare necessity to republicans.  He won because of dubious fund raising from foreign sources.  He won because there are a lot of sheep among the electorate who want a messiah to take care of them.

Here is the view of a successful trial lawyer who manages to cut to the chase with a few well-chosen observations:


As I mentioned in our intermittent club pub conversations on the subject of Moderate Mitt, I never thought he would have any real chance of beating the worst president imaginable. I never thought otherwise at any stage of the campaign.
While I respected your always incredibly informed political acumen, the simple truth for me is that wets never win. Never. Or as I mentioned to Herman Cain in LA a few months back, you never beat a demagogic vision with no vision.
Put another way, if I tried high profile cases using consultants like Stuart Stevens, I would spend boatloads of my clients’ money, and end up lamenting that it seemed impossible to lose because we had such great arguments, and ultimately blame the stupid fact finders and the demographics of the jury and their “baggage.” We’ve both seen our share of big firm litigators in that mode, haven’t we, thankfully usually on the other side.
I only know one way to win these arguments: by putting overwhelming intellectual, moral and affective pressure on the other side until my metaphors imprison and prevail. Get the theory and attack and define relentlessly, albeit of course with charm. :)
My almost visceral reaction to a relatively smart and decent guy was his manifest propensity to lose the unlosable.
Demographics? They haven’t changed much since the 2010 shellacking of the Democrats, ditto the so-called tipping point or 47 per cent.
What happened is in my view less complicated.
1) Romney let himself get defined early in the same brutal way we would define a litigation adversary early and often. The definition largely stuck and there was no early response, and no aggressive defining of an opponent who was a walking, talking incredibly rich target.
2) Romney organized a colorless and utterly insipid convention the point of which was to establish that he wasn’t as bad as the other side made him out to be and he really loved and some of his best friends were women.
3) Romney’s campaign then stumbled forward on a benign, six basic metrics referendum on the economy tack, leaving a treasure trove laden rich armory of munitions undeployed. Obamacare, the explosive issue of 2010 ignored. Social issues tied to huge avenues of attack on Obama viewed as too controversial, foreign policy neutered, Dukakis competence thought able to carry the day, all from the conventional Tory playbook, without sharp edges or ideological vision.
4) When he finally showed a pulse in the first debate and acted like he could almost be a decent trial lawyer, he got an immediate bump in the polls, and, immediately, lapsed back into a play it safe, sit on a lead, be nice and bipartisan mode. He couldn’t even do the Benghazi battle.
5) His everybody loves this country, reach across the aisle close was the final insipid wetness.
I hated to be Nate Silver but Mittens never had a chance against a terrible President with the silliest of demagogic campaigns.
Unfortunately the country is the big loser because the Republican candidate, for the second straight time, was not up to taking a failed and horrible president to task.  
Finally, it comes down to this quote from a blog thread :  "you can't let the other side define the debate. You have to set the terms: "I paid for this microphone." But, looking ahead to 2016, even a new Ronald Reagan will have a difficult time punching through the vast sea of simple-minded left-wing indoctrination dispensed in our schools and popular culture—that and the depths of simple ignorance of the voters the Democrats rely upon. How many of Obambi's voters knew about, or cared about, Benghazi, the 'fiscal cliff', Medicare and Social Security bankruptcy, even unemployment numbers?
The conservative wing of the Republican Party had better start thinking in earnest about how to cut through this fog of welfare mentality and abject ignorance. Given the lock the teachers' unions, and the university academics, and the Hollywood celebrities have on the young, is it even feasible to think about teaching the young and foolish about the principles of American Constitutional government, about free enterprise? If not, the game is up. We'll end up a giant Greece. "