Thursday, June 21, 2012
Istanbul, Bosporus History
National Geographic has produced a fascination video that describes the amazing engineering feat of the crossing of the Bosporus with a train tunnel 160 feet deep. In the course of building this tunnel, started in 2005 and supposed to be finished in 2010, a major archeological find was made that has delayed the completion of the project until 2013 or later. The Marmaray Tunnel website is here where you will find most interesting facts about the construction of the tunnel. BTW, the spelling of what most of us know of Marmara apparently has morphed into Marmaray in the case of this tunnel, at least on their site.. What makes this project especially interesting is the fact the tunnel is being built 12 miles from one of the world's most active faults, the North Anatolian Fault. Some scientists believe the area is overdue for a major quake within the next few years.
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
A test!
Is this humbling or what?????
Subject: 1895 8th grade final exam
--
|
Ron Paul vs. Paul Krugman
This segment on Bloomberg in which Ron Paul and Paul Krugman air their differences in a 15 minute video clip is an extremely vivid example of liberal and conservative differences on a host of subjects related to the economy and governance. Krugman is a Keynsian and Paul a von Misean. Their discussion has been going on since these two schools of economic thought emerged in the aftermath of WWI, now almost 100 years ago. It's worth noting that Freidrich Hayek, a student of von Mises', a contemporary of Keynes, and maybe the best known to Americans of all the Austrians, was actually in the Austrian government when the horrific inflation of the German currency occurred in the aftermath of WWI, the event that led to the destruction of the savings off the German middle class, the rise of the Nazis and the devastation of WWII. There is an inbred fear of inflation bred into the Austrian School of Economics that seems to lead to an inbred fear of fiat money. You see this same attitude reflected in Ron Paul's comments. Krugman dismisses all Paul's fears, including the idea of rejecting central banking and a returning to the gold standard by saying the worldwide economy and financial scene is so complicated at this point that no one can even accurately describe what money actually is. How this debate ends up over the next decade or so will determine where the US and world economy ends up. It's the issues of big government versus smaller government, individual freedoms versus collective group rights, capitalism versus socialism, and so forth. It seems pretty clear from the examples of the USSR, Cuba, North Korea, and now much of Europe, that socialism does not work. The discussion seems to be coming down to what is the proper definition of Capitalism. Is it closer to the definition of the Austrian School or the version that has evolved since the Hoover-Roosevelt period when Big Government was unleashed in an attempt to eliminate its inherent uncertainties and risks? In other words how much managing can Capitalism take before it stops functioning as the worldwide engine of prosperity it has been? Quite a question!
Sunday, June 10, 2012
Perhaps Paul Krugman can explain this chart of his in light of this quote of Roosevelt's Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morganthau Jr., who famously said, in 1939 after six years of New Deal Keynsian spending programs :"“We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work.” Of course what he meant by that was the unemployment rate was virtually the same as it was when Roosevelt came into office in 1933. Despite the facts Keynsians stick by their man, for some reason.
OR?
Saturday, June 9, 2012
They're on to him, finally
Two events this past week suggest Obama's days in the White House are numbered. The first was the recall vote in Wisconsin and the second the WH presser at which O pronounced the private sector economy was "fine". Coming on the heels of the comfortable win by Governor Walker in his recall election, Obama's line suggests he's seriously out of touch with reality. Presently over 23 million Americans are out of work or looking for work and in either event nothing is "fine" in an economy producing as few jobs and opportunities as ours. Walker's recall election victory in a traditionally liberal blue state tells all the socialists in the country that the "jig is up". It is also clear that democrats are nervous and many have given up on Obama's chances in November.. It is amusing to watch some of the "talking heads" on so-called news program panels moving away from their previous slavish pro-Obama stands to much more critical positions. Even the always reliable Lanny Davis, a frontline political advisor to Clinton, has turned highly negative. Ah yes, even the rats are leaving the sinking ship. Good riddance. Meanwhile our peripatetic president attends fund raisers at such a clip, (more at this stage of the election cycle than both Bushes and Clinton combined!) that it's hard to keep track of his physical whereabouts. It's usually a good bet that he's either in Hollywood with his flaky pals George Clooney, et al, or in New York where the other big money pot is, or in one of the battleground states he has to win stay employed for the next four years. Obama would do well to dust off his curriculum vitae, get some competent ghost writer to help embellish it, and begin looking right now. This is not the best of times to have to look for work, especially if your work experience and record is iffy.
Monday, June 4, 2012
The coming collapse
Peter Schiff is above all else a realist. He tells the world here what he thinks is coming our way in very short order, and it's not pretty. Anyone having read any of the number of books about currency collapses in earlier times would have to agree with Schiff's prediction about our currency because causes of financial implosions are pretty much the same over and over. Typically, excessive debt creation results in excessive speculation which results in excessive creation of fiat money which results in inflation and currency debasement. Currency debasement results in the destruction of savings and the middle class. It appears we are somewhere around the excessive creation of fiat money stage of this cycle, about to be visited by inflation and major currency debasement. Whether this cycle is too far along to save the day or not, we're about to find out. A friend has just completed his own careful and exhaustive analysis of our circumstances and concludes with a series of speculative and fundamental questions everyone should at the very least be asking themselves about now. There may be other questions, but here are his:
1). What are the odds of muddling through this financial quagmire in Europe and the US?
2). What are the odds of experiencing a major shock -- default in Spain or a major European country, collapse of the
Euro, major bank failure(s) in Europe or the US, Israel invading Iran, etc?
3). How do we protect ourselves on the downside?
4). How can we protect our children and grandchildren?
5). What should we invest in?
6). Where should we live?
1). What are the odds of muddling through this financial quagmire in Europe and the US?
2). What are the odds of experiencing a major shock -- default in Spain or a major European country, collapse of the
Euro, major bank failure(s) in Europe or the US, Israel invading Iran, etc?
3). How do we protect ourselves on the downside?
4). How can we protect our children and grandchildren?
5). What should we invest in?
6). Where should we live?
Monday, May 28, 2012
The left's love affair with Castro's Cuba
The Castro brothers have now run Cuba for nearly eighty years and the results are horrific.
But this state of affairs seems quite agreeable to the liberals who worship these two socialist thugs. Clearly what they must like, since it can't be the Cubans's historically low standard of living, is the fact everyone is equally poor. It is this inference that tells the rest of us that liberals are simply garden variety socialists. Sean Penn, Barbara Streisand, and other loons from La La Land, along with Jimmy Carter and most liberal politicians, are forever touting Castro's leadership and accomplishments although the rest of us have difficulty seeing either. For those who've been to the Bund, Shanghai's famous waterfront overlooking the newest section of the city called Podung Area and the Huangpu River, may have marveled at all the high rises that have sprung up over the last thirty plus years. In fact Shanghai now has many more high rises than New York City and more under construction. Part of one well-known Shanghai guide's presentation is to point out a particular high rise, among those many, owned by a Cuban. Not just any Cuban, mind you, but Fidel's very own brother Raul. And there you have socialism in a nutshell. The people live in penury, and the dear leaders buy themselves real estate in the world's fastest growing city which, by the way, doesn't happen to be in Cuba. Nice. Wonder how many Castro apologists know about this scam. But then again who cares as long as everyone is equal. And so it goes in the ObamaLand of Hollywood and liberal political precincts.
But this state of affairs seems quite agreeable to the liberals who worship these two socialist thugs. Clearly what they must like, since it can't be the Cubans's historically low standard of living, is the fact everyone is equally poor. It is this inference that tells the rest of us that liberals are simply garden variety socialists. Sean Penn, Barbara Streisand, and other loons from La La Land, along with Jimmy Carter and most liberal politicians, are forever touting Castro's leadership and accomplishments although the rest of us have difficulty seeing either. For those who've been to the Bund, Shanghai's famous waterfront overlooking the newest section of the city called Podung Area and the Huangpu River, may have marveled at all the high rises that have sprung up over the last thirty plus years. In fact Shanghai now has many more high rises than New York City and more under construction. Part of one well-known Shanghai guide's presentation is to point out a particular high rise, among those many, owned by a Cuban. Not just any Cuban, mind you, but Fidel's very own brother Raul. And there you have socialism in a nutshell. The people live in penury, and the dear leaders buy themselves real estate in the world's fastest growing city which, by the way, doesn't happen to be in Cuba. Nice. Wonder how many Castro apologists know about this scam. But then again who cares as long as everyone is equal. And so it goes in the ObamaLand of Hollywood and liberal political precincts.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)